Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Keep it in your pants..?

I don't know where I read it, but the phrase has stuck in my mind. It was something like, when I look at a spanking image I don't want someone else's genitals shoved in my face.
It wasn't a critique of this blog, but of spanking-related blogs as a whole. And it made me think about the images I use - are they too full on?
Personally, I have no problem with the face-genitals interface. It's what faces and genitals are all about, isn't it. But it did make me revisit what a blog is all about - are the images there for the edification of the blogger or for the reader? If I like anatomically detailed images, but readers prefer not to see the bits and pieces what shoud the blog's "policy" be?
For me a good spanking can't be a good spanking without a bare bottom. And so genitals are part of the deal, that may not to be to every taste. What do you think, I'd be interested to know?

6 comments:

  1. It is possible to have nice bottom pics without everything being on display, as shown by that wonderful pic in your piece. My blog has plenty of pics of Mrs CS and her spanked bottom, but no other parts. I like it that way that's all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with what Country Spaner said. I personally try to avoid putting up photos with "naughty bits" that are gratuitous. However, I think your policy should be that you put up whatever types of pictures you want to make the point you're trying to make, and then let people decide if they want to look at them or not. Unfortunately you can't please everyone.

    If you want to try to have it both ways, one possibility is to put photos that you think some will find offensive "below the fold" using a jump break (there's a Blogger icon for it) and warn people not to click to see more if they don't want to see something explicit. I haven't done that, but it's a thought.

    The easiest course is to do what makes you happy and not worry about whether other people like it or not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you kind sirs, and welcome Country Spanker. Input duly noted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with OldFashionedGirl, a spanking should be bare bottom and in that case seeing the genitals is just part of spanking a naughty bare bottom. However when posting pictures of a spanking or a spanked bottom or even a bottom about to get spanked, I make an attempt to keep the genitals out of the picture, like the one above. But I am definitely not offended in any way if someone else posts all the pieces and parts.

    Just joined your site and am enjoying it very much, looking forward to reading much more from you

    HUGS,
    Dave

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi, thanks for the kind words and the observation on 'parts and pieces'. I like that phrase parts and pieces, makes a change from the usual bits and bobs.
    CW

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well you knoe me, I love a long panty spanking but the bare bottom and all it allows to be seen and touched is the only way to finish off a spanking.
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete